Epidemiological Report on Stomach Cancer Tobacco Smoking

Epidemiological Report on Stomach crabby person baccy plant Smoking1.0 BACKGROUNDCancer is among the leading ca customs of closing in the world. In 2012, crabmeat was responsible for 8.2 unity million million deaths and 14.1 million new cases were recorded, accounting for 65% of the deaths in low-middle income countries (IARC, GLOBOCAN, 2012a). Cancer is a multistage process characterised by un containled extension of kinky cells which familyers a lump to develop. This lump, know as a tumour, is named aft(prenominal) the part of the body where it develops (American Cancer Society, 2012). Although mortality rate argon postgraduate in low-middle income countries, increased incidental rates have been found in developed countries (IARC, GLOBOCAN, 2012a). An increase of 8 million cases per year is expected by 2030 (WHO, 2014).A repress of movers atomic number 18 persuasion to be responsible for create pubic lo utilisation such as genetic factors, chemicals and radia tion, vir employs or infections, alcohol intent, baccy, diet, and material inactivity, age and several to a greater extent that still remain unidentified (WHO, 2014 American Cancer Society, 2012). Lifestyle plays an important role in health. Ab out 30% of deaths due to malignant neoplastic disease are associated with poor lifestyle behaviour, which is marked by obesity, low fruit and ve take outable intake, economic consumption of alcohol and tobacco use (WHO, 2014).Despite tobacco being the most preventable cause of death it kills 1 person every six seconds. The tobacco epidemic kills much(prenominal) than 5,000,000 people in a year which is more than the combined turn of events of deaths by malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS (WHO, 2008). Tobacco use contributes to near 20% of crabmeat deaths globally (WHO, 2014).A plethora of evidence exists demonstrating the strong carcinogenic nature of tobacco mint, and its ability to cause pubic louse at multiple sites in the body and not just the lungs. It can cause cancer of the renal pelvis and bladder, oral cavity, larynx, pancreas, nasal cavity, liver, cervix, hold up, kidney and oesophagus (Vineis et al., 2004). Smokers are 7 times at more risk of dying from these cancers than non-smokers (Kenfield et al., 2008)2.0 context of use2.1 DEMOGRAPHY, PREVALENCE OF DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGYIn 2012 stomach cancer, similarly known as gastric cancer, was ranked as the third major cause of cancer related mortality in the world with 723,000 deaths reported (IARC, GLOBOCAN, 2012b). An estimated one million cases of stomach cancer were recorded in the year 2012. This represents 6.8% of the contribute cancer cases reported. Stomach cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide with approximately one million cases in the following year of which 70% of the cases occurred in low- middle income countries (IARC, GLOBOCAN, 2012b). The numbers of stomach cancer cases have importantly reduced over the old age (IARC, GL OBOCAN, 2012b) and several epidemiological studies have been conducted to depict the causes of the disease and the reason for this decline. Figure 1 demonstrates estimated stomach neoplasm incidence and mortality (age- standardised per 100,000) worldwide in the year 2012. Distinct geographical differences exist with two third of the cases occurring in developing countries, and 50% of the total gastric cancer cases occurring in Eastern Asia. Eastern Asia has both eminent incident as well as mortality rates, but occidental Africa has the lowest incidence and North America the lowest mortality rates. The incident rates (age standardised per 100,000) of stomach cancer are twice as high in hands as compared to women. The striking time trends, geographical variations and gender distribution suggest the potential contribution of lifestyle and environmental factors to the aetiology of carcinoma of the stomach.Figure 1 Source IARC, GLOBOCAN, 20122.2 EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES SHOWING acq uaintance BETWEEN STOMACH CANCER AND TOBACCO USEInfection with Helicobacter pylori is one of the main causes of gastric neoplasm (Tredaniel, 1997) however, in certain countries like Africa, where H.pylori has high prevalence, stomach cancer rates are still low (Campbell et al., 2001 Brenner, Rothenbacher and Arndt, 2009). This suggests that in that respect may be other factors too responsible for gastric neoplasm. A large number of studies have demonstrated a strong positively charged familiarity amid stomach cancer and tobacco use. The association is thought to be because of the carcinogenic substances present in tobacco smoke. Tobacco smoke contains about 70 carcinogenic substances, like hydrogen cyanide, arsenic, cadmium, carbon monoxide and others, which when inhaled memorialize the lungs, and is carried by the blood stream to other sites in the body, depleting the sites of oxygen indispensable for survival, and more importantly, damaging the DNA make cells to proliferat e in an abnormal manner and cause cancer (Cancer look for UK, 2012).A number of case- control studies have demonstrated stomach cancer to be a tobacco related cancer (Minami and Tateno, 2003 Cai, Zheng and Zhang, 2003). A fourteen year prospective conceive conducted by the American Cancer Society showed a positive correlation coefficient between stomach carcinoma and the use of tobacco (Chao et al., 2003). According to the study, any contour of tobacco use (pipe, cigar, bidi, chewing tobacco, fagot sess and snuff) was considered to be united with higher incidence and mortality rates of stomach cancer. The study include 508, 351 men and 676,306 females aged thirty years or older, residing in a house with at least one individual forty-five years or above. The individuals were chosen from fifty states in the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. workforce were made to complete questionnaires, with questions about current or past use of any tobacco product, while women only asked about use of cigarette smoking. The study was adjusted for all variables thought to act as contradictory factors age, race, family history, education, diet, use of multivitamins and aspirin (Chao et al., 2003).Tobacco users among men are 1.68 times more in all probability to die of stomach cancer and women who use tobacco are 1.38 times more likely than non-tobacco users. Men who are currently tobacco users are 2.12 times (95% CI, 1.76-2.54) as likely to die of gastric carcinoma as those who have never smoked tobacco. Women smokers are 1.5 times at more risk than non-smokers ( fudge 1). And the risk increased with the duration of tobacco use (Chao et al. 2003)Table 1 Tobacco Use and relational Risk of Gastric CancerType of Tobacco UseMenRelative Risk (95% CI)WomenRelative Risk (95% CI)Never-used any type of tobacco1.001.00Ever-user of any type of tobacco1.73 (1.472.04)1.34 (1.121.60)Current user of any type of tobacco2.12 (1.762.54)1.51 (1.201.90)Source Chao et al., 2003(Modifie d and inclined(p) in MS. Word according to required data)3.0 METHOD/ DATAIn order to assess the possible causal relationship between carcinoma of stomach and the use of tobacco particularly in current tobacco smokers, data was withdrawn from WHO database. Data for nine countries with the highest incident rates were taken from IARC, GLOBOCAN (2012) database and the tobacco rates for each country were taken from Tobacco Country profile from the WHO Report on Global Epidemics (WHO, 2013). The data from the two sources was combined to form one table for purpose of analysing the relationship.RankCountryAge-Standardised Rate per 100,000 (World)preponderance of Tobacco Use (%)20121Korea, Republic of41.825.72Mongolia32.5273Japan29.9224Guatemala23.7105China22.7256Kazakhstan21.6247Kyrgyzstan21.4238Albania20.1269Belarus18.829Table 2 Data showing incidence of gastric cancer in both sexes in 2012 (IARC, GLOBOCAN, 2012)Data showing tobacco use in adults in the year 2012 (WHO, 2013)In order to get a clear picture, a graph (Figure 2) was drawn from the data in Table 2 to understand if there was a co-relation between the exposure, i.e., tobacco use and resultant role, i.e., stomach cancer and if it was appropriate to refer gastric cancer as a tobacco-related cancer as has been referred by many other studies.Figure 3 Incidence of stomach cancer and tobacco useData from IARC, GLOBOCAN (2012) and Tobacco Country Profile (WHO, 2013) collected in MS Excel and graph generated in MS World4.0 RESULTSStriking results were observe on analysing the data and graphs. High rates of tobacco consumption were considered to be responsible for causing stomach carcinoma. It was expected that the countries showing high number of stomach cancer cases would also show high consumption of tobacco among the population. However, an irregular trend is observed between the exposure and outcome. The Republic of Korea, having the highest rates of stomach cancer should have shown high rates of tobacco use, however, it shows land rates of tobacco smoking than Belarus. Similarly, Belarus having the lowest number of stomach cancer cases among the nine listed countries, demonstrates the highest prevalence of tobacco usage in adults.5.0 DISCUSSIONseveral(prenominal) epidemiologic studies have shown a positive causal relationship between tobacco smoke and increased incidence of stomach cancer. Evidence suggests that 20% of the stomach cancer cases in the United Kingdom can be attributed to the use of tobacco (Cancer Research UK, 2014). However, a few studies like the self-analysis of data above were unable to find any positive association between stomach cancer and tobacco use.In a xx eight year cohort study conducted in Norway, with 26,000 Norwegian men and women, no association was found between stomach cancer and tobacco consumption (Engeland, 1996). Similarly a case control study carried out in Japan seemed to show no relationship of tobacco use and increased rates of stomach can cer (Murata, 1996).When considering epidemiological studies and their results, flaws in data collection and study design must be considered before making an inference. Case control studies are most susceptible to parti pris. There are high chances of selection bias, especially when the investigator is not blinded. other bias that has the potential to sum results of case control studies is attention bias, which is also known by the Hawthorne effect, according to which people tend to act and behave other than when they know the relation being studied (Bruce et al., 2008). Similarly, cohort studies may expose uncertain results because of their long duration which results in loss to follow up, also known as attrition bias.Questionnaires are considered to be the main research tools when it comes to collection of data from a large sample population. Although questionnaires are an useful and cheap way of gathering data, there are some possible errors that should be taken care of. Th ese specifically include sampling error and measurement error (Bruce et al., 2008).An extremely important factor that can be attributed to the difference in results is confounding. For factors to be considered confounders, they need to have an association with the outcome of interest. alcohol consumption can be considered a confounding factor in the relationship between stomach cancer and tobacco use. Alcohol consumption is considered to have a synergistic effect (Chen, 2000). However, the synergistic effect of alcohol is considered to be controversial, with some studies demonstrating no effect of alcohol consumption on stomach cancer rates (Murata, 1996 Cancer Research UK, 2014). Another main factor is H.pylori infection, which is the considered to be the main cause of carcinoma of the stomach. Studies have showed that in tobacco users who have H.pylori infection, they are 10 times more likely to develop carcinoma of the stomach than those who do not smoke tobacco (Cancer Research UK, 2014 Tredaniel, 1997). Other possible confounders include diet.Although differences in results can be observed, smoking is known to be an established risk factor for most cancers and diseases. It shall be inappropriate to conclude that no association exists between stomach cancer and the consumption of tobacco. The magnitude of the association can vary but it would be wrong to deny any association at all. It can therefrom be concluded, that tobacco use, may not be an independent factor like Helicobacter pylori in the aetiology of stomach cancer, but it is a alter factor for the development of carcinoma of stomach. The use of the word contributory does not by any way rule out the possibility of tobacco having a direct effect on stomach cancer, it in fact, takes into account the unyielding risk of cancer among smokers and indicates that had smoking not exist, a large and earthshaking proportion of disease burden would not exist in this world.