Theory integration on 3 terrorism cases Term Paper

supposition integration on 3 terrorist act cases - Term Paper ExampleThe theories on terrorism are also as well as varied, such as to defy an integrative understanding of the phenomenon. This paper will therefore explain the Jewish-Orthodox and non-orthodox theories on terrorism, applying these to three known cases of terrorism. Analytical discussion will try to show that the hypothesis is legal and relevant. Orthodox terrorism theories Terrorism is a highly debatable issue. Its complexity e military manates from the primeval nature of man to sow lethal violence against his kind. It is estimated that the 18th century French Revolution gave impetus to in advance(p) terrorism that led to the upsurge of contemporary terrorism with its state, interstate and global dimensions. Thus far, orthodox theories on modern terrorism have been used to understand cases of terrorism, but these have been subjected to debates. In an in-depth analysis, Jason Franks opened up a discussion of the Or thodox Terrorism Theory or theories, proposing a more comprehensive non-orthodox understanding of the phenomenon which be applicable in the many years to come. For Franks, the Orthodox Theory is capable of answering the questions what makes up terrorism and how it can be countered. However, he notes that the Orthodox Theory fails to adequately answer why it happens. ... o twinge and intimidate governments to accept political, religious or ideological objectives, and secondly in defence of the terrorist act as when Hezbollah leader Sheikh Fadlallah described terrorism as fighting with special means against assailant nations in religious and lawful warfare against world imperial powers. ( Kramer n.p.). The situation shows that it is difficult to establish a sound foundation for research and policy on terrorism. This may also suggest that resolving the phenomenal rise of terrorism may continue to meet difficulties in the times ahead. To be fair, the Orthodox Theory on Terrorism has m erits. It comprises the western model of understanding terrorism along the human ideals of liberty, rule of law, and popular life in society. It is also a practical concept in dealing with acts of terrorism as threats to state authority. The Orthodox Theory has laid down three useful themes on terror acts, that is to say (a) Functional, as embodied by the Theory of Provocation, or the belief that terrorism aims to provoke a response from a repressive state by means of strategies that will radicalize citizens against government (Laqueur 72) (b) Symbolic or the accounting that terror acts have image- value under the idea of terrorism in theatre (Jenkins 132), and (c) Tactical as terrorists use strategies along short-term objectives such as hijacking, as well as long-term objectives to forward-moving the broader cause of revolution. In spite of merits derived from the Orthodox understanding of terrorism, Franks perceives that this approach needs to be improved owe to the new terror istic environment which has pushed terrorism beyond the state into interstate and global boundaries. The alternative terrorism guess Improving on the orthodox theory, Franks